🔗 Share this article

United States armed forces have eliminated four individuals in an attack on a vessel in waters close to Venezuela that was purportedly carrying illegal substances, as stated by Pentagon chief declarations.

"The military action was carried out in open seas just near Venezuela while the ship was moving significant quantities of illegal substances - destined for America to harm our citizens," military representatives stated in a government release.

This represents the latest in a series of lethal attacks that the US has conducted on ships in global maritime zones it asserts are engaged in "drug smuggling".

The military actions have drawn censure in states like Venezuela and Colombia, with several jurisprudence specialists labeling the operations as a breach of international law.

Mission Information

Defense authorities confirmed the attack took place in the US military command's operational zone, which covers the majority of South America and the Caribbean.

"Our intelligence, without a doubt, established that this ship was transporting drugs, the persons aboard were narco-terrorists, and they were traveling along a recognized drug smuggling transit route," authorities announced about this latest strike.

"Such operations will persist until the threats on the US citizens are over!!!!"

The President furthermore confirmed the military action on online networks, claiming that the ship was transporting sufficient illegal substances "to fatally harm 25 to 50 thousand people".

Debate and Dispute

However, the US has not provided proof for its assertions or any information about the backgrounds of those on board.

There was no immediate response from Venezuela but its president has earlier condemned the attacks and said his nation will defend itself against US "aggression".

Friday's fatal attack is the fourth by the US in a recent timeframe.

Earlier, military leaders had stated that eleven persons had been fatally struck in a strike against a narcotics-transporting vessel in the tropical waters at the start of September.

Afterward in the period, two distinct strikes within days of each other resulted in the deaths of a combined six people.

Policy Background

This in the past week, a unauthorized document delivered to Congress – covered by media outlets – said the US federal authorities had now concluded it was in a "non-international armed conflict" with trafficking groups.

This is notable because the executive branch is obligated by law to notify Congress if it will deploy the defense establishment, which indicates it intends to use further armed intervention.

The US has framed its strikes on purported trafficking ships as self-defence, regardless of many jurisprudence authorities disputing their juridical validity.

Presenting this as an active armed conflict is likely a method to justify using heightened military authorities – for example killing "adversaries" even if they have not demonstrated a violent threat, or detaining people without limit.

These represent similar privileges to those used against previous groups in earlier military situations.

Government officials have not provided the rationale for why they seem to be designating illegal substances trade and connected illegal activities as an "military assault", or identified which cartels they consider are threatening the US.

Government representatives have already designated many cartels, such as those in Mexico, Ecuador and Venezuela, as terrorist organisations – granting US officials enhanced authorities in their reaction to them.