🔗 Share this article

The Trump administration seemed ready on Wednesday to deploy scores of federal agents to the Bay Area region for a significant border security initiative, prompting condemnation from state officials.

Information of the Operation

Information of the mission were still emerging, but it will allegedly feature more than 100 government officers, as reported. The personnel are scheduled to begin occupying the Coast Guard facility in the East Bay, facing San Francisco. It was still uncertain whether military personnel would participate.

Official Response

The mission comes after months of warnings by the president to focus on the Democratic-run city. Governor Gavin Newsom condemned the move, calling it “right out of the dictator’s handbook”.

“He sends out unidentified officers, he deploys Border Patrol, he dispatches ICE, he generates anxiety and fear in the community so that he can take credit for solving that by dispatching the national guard,” the governor stated. “This is no different than the incendiary fighting the inferno.”

City Preparation

San Francisco is the latest major city targeted by the administration's initiative of large-scale detentions. The operation is anticipated to provoke a confrontation between the federal government and local leaders who have pledged to stop armed border control in the city.

San Franciscans have been readying for weeks for Trump to fulfill ongoing warnings to dispatch personnel to the city. At a Wednesday afternoon press conference, San Francisco’s city leader stated again that the city was ready.

“Over recent weeks, we have been anticipating the likelihood of some kind of national intervention in our city,” declared the leader, explaining that he had taken further executive actions on Wednesday to “strengthen the city’s support for our foreign-born residents, and make certain our agencies are organized prior to any national intervention.”

Constitutional Framework

In spite of court battles to deployments in a several municipalities, including the Windy City, Oregon and Southern California, Trump has asserted “absolute authority” to dispatch the state troops in cities, referencing the presidential authority which allows presidents limited power to deploy troops on US soil.

Public Response

Newsom – who previously served as San Francisco’s chief executive – had committed to intervene “without delay” to a operation in the city. “The concept that the national administration can deploy troops into our cities with no valid reason supported by evidence, no supervision, no accountability, disregard for regional control – it represents an infringement on the rule of law,” he said on Wednesday.

Public associations, including advocacy organizations established during the previous presidential term, have prepared to quickly mobilize a public demonstration in the city, as well as candlelight gatherings at public spaces.

Neighborhood Effect

In San Francisco’s Mission area, a largely Hispanic population, local representative stated to media last week she and her voters had been bracing for this time. “The point that employees avoid workplaces, when anyone Black or brown can’t freely walk outside without the apprehension of government officers targeting based on race and arresting them, the time when parents stop sending kids to school, grow too frightened to go to the supermarket or medical provider,” she said. “The readiness efforts in the Mission is basically a closure the likes of which we haven’t seen since the health crisis.”

National Guard Condition

About several hundred out of 4,000 state state soldiers continue under national command under an directive from Trump. Roughly several hundred of them had been sent to the Pacific Northwest, where they were waiting in limbo amid a legal battle over their deployment.

This time, Newsom said he had called the state military personnel under his authority to manage charity kitchens throughout the government shutdown.